Food sovereignty and its dynamism in public policies in Mexico: 2019-2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38128/cienciayfilosofa.v15i17.134Keywords:
food sovereignty, public policies, economic dynamism, conceptual evolution, populismAbstract
This is a relevant literature review limited to the topic of food sovereignty, based on two procedures. The first consisted of assigning a random algorithm to sort dispersed data into ordered data using four search engines: two global and two regional. A local repository was also included, covering a ten-year period. Once the data was sorted, artificial intelligence was used solely to analyze the iterations in the evolution of the ordered lists of sources. In the second procedure, a network map generated by the VOSviewer technology tool was used to interpret what is called disciplinary consensus. This network map includes publications dedicated to patent development, publications on knowledge validity, high-impact publications, and publications on knowledge retrieval and organization, which define the processes of scientometrics for measuring scientific progress. These two procedures were contrasted to infer that the issue of food sovereignty draws from different perspectives, which throughout its evolution have not only developed their own concepts but have also diversified public policies within an international law framework for conventional political constitutions, as in the case of Mexico. It is concluded that the dynamism of public policies on food sovereignty is reflected in the evolution of the literature over the last decade, while acknowledging gaps in a systematic understanding.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aguilar, J. L. (2024). Dos teorías rivales en política internacional: La importancia de la anomalía. Astrolabio: revista internacional de filosofía, (28), 168-182.
Chartier, R. (2018). Las revoluciones de la cultura escrita (Vol. 302653). Editorial Gedisa
Hess, D. J. (1997). Estudios científicos: una introducción avanzada. Citado en definiciones de cienciometría.
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). Una revisión de la teoría y la práctica en cienciometría. Revista Europea de Investigación Operativa, 246(1), 1-19.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026482
The Long Now Foundation. (2019, 22 de noviembre). Patrick Charaudeau : el discurso populista [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjvzkISOFeA
Nees Jan van Eck. (2024, marzo 14). Webinar: OpenAlex and VOSViewer: Uniting to enable free, easy, and high-quality research analytics [Webinar]. OpenAlex. https://openalex.org
Ruiz Mendoza, K. K. (2026). Manual apegado a APA 7.ª edición para citar, documentar y transparentar el uso de Inteligencia Artificial Generativa (IAGen) (Versión de trabajo del 1 de junio de 2026). Safe Creative (Registro 2606035944951). https://www.safecreative.org/work/2606035944951
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hugo Tavira Chanelo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access Statement as defined by DOAJ
“Open Access” is a general term encompassing both Free and Open Access. For DOAJ, open access is defined only when digital content is freely available online and user rights and copyright terms are clearly defined.
All texts published by Ciencia y filosofía ISSN: 2594-2204—without exception—are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of their article published in Ciencia y filosofía ISSN: 2594-2204 (for example, including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book), provided they clearly indicate that the work was first published in Ciencia y filosofía ISSN: 2594-2204.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license.
You are free to:
Share


